So, I had a brief conversation with Maria Maltseva today. I responded to a tweet of hers concerning an interview in Rolling Stone with Anita Sarkeesian.
Would you believe it? Someone has such an obsession with Christina Hoff Sommers that she’s either posted directly about her, or uncharitably mentioned her in 35 blog posts.
This is so sad, it’s actually a bit, well, funny.
In case you cannot read what is written on the poster board:
“I have a Master of Arts degree in women studies. However, the only job I can find is as a bartender at a local restaurant. I owe over 60K in student loans. I am forced to rely on foodstamps and W.I.C.* to support my son.Is this the “American Dream” I worked so hard for? I am the 99 percent.”
Then there’s a link to occupywallst.org.
I have no idea what Wall Street has to do with her poor decision making in choosing a career but it seems to be a fad.
Hat Tip to AtheistLoki who tweeted this picture with the response “You chose poorly”.
*Women Infants Children
Joss Whedon to the rescue of the SJW’s!
Wait a minute! Isn’t he an old (50), rich, white man? Why do the feminists pay any attention to him?
Way to go with the KKK comparison!
This is why I don’t pay attention to any of the hollywood-types. Most of them are just stupid. Oh, and you know what Joss? The movies and TV shows you make? Have you looked at the demographics of your audience?
I wonder how many people you just lost.
Hmmm, Nihilist and Misogynist?
I don’t think she knows what either of those words mean, but then I don’t make up my own definitions to words as the SJW’s always seem to do.
I am constantly amused by others that say that being an atheist is more than what it actually is: a non-belief in god(s).
What is it called when someone takes the time in an article to quote another person exactly, then below that quote, completely ignore it and transform the statement into something the person didn’t say? Oh yes. It’s called misrepresentation.
There’s been an interesting discussion on Twitter this evening about if and when it’s justified to “drop docs” on another person that is basically anonymous while online.
Well, what can anyone expect? How does Anita know that “atheist” men are more hateful?
This is what I’d call a “stupid person”. No more, no less. She constantly lies about and misrepresents any and all of those that may happen to disagree with her.
Why is it anyone pays any attention to her? I don’t get it but this tweet alone, without any attribution, says more than any of us could ever say about her.
Yeah, maybe not go there.
This is what occurs when your brain is infected with the SJW virus.